ITEM NO.3 Court 8 (Video Conferencing) SECTION XVII-A
\nSUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS CIVIL APPEAL<\/p>\n
Diary No(s). 14338\/2020
\n(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 20-05-2019 in EA No. 54416\/2015 passed by the Custom Excise Service Tax Appelate Tribunal)<\/p>\n
PR. COMMISSIONER CENTRAL EXCISE DELHI I –Petitioner(s)
\nVERSUS
\nDESIGN DIALOGUES INDIA PVT. LTD. –Respondent(s)<\/p>\n
( IA No.99583\/2020-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C\/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.99582\/2020-STAY APPLICATION and IA No.99581\/2020-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING APPEAL )
\nWITH
\nDiary No(s). 13084\/2020 (XVII-A)
\n( IA No.83444\/2020-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.83446\/2020-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C\/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.83445\/2020-EX-PARTE STAY)<\/p>\n
Diary No(s). 15831\/2020 (XVII-A)
\n( IA No.83755\/2020-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C\/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.83756\/2020-STAY APPLICATION and IA No.83751\/2020-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING APPEAL)<\/p>\n
Date : 29-06-2021<\/p>\n
These petitions were called on for hearing today.<\/p>\n
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNA MURARI
\nUPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following ORDER<\/p>\n
The impugned order was passed by the CESTAT on 20-05-2019 and the proposal is stated to have been sent by the applicant to the Ministry of Finance on 06-01-2020, after six months.<\/p>\n
2 <\/strong> 3<\/strong> List on 03-09-2021. ITEM NO.3 Court 8 (Video Conferencing) SECTION XVII-A SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS CIVIL APPEAL Diary No(s). 14338\/2020 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 20-05-2019<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[8],"tags":[],"post_folder":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/indadfo.com\/site\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/910"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/indadfo.com\/site\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/indadfo.com\/site\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/indadfo.com\/site\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/indadfo.com\/site\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=910"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/indadfo.com\/site\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/910\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":916,"href":"https:\/\/indadfo.com\/site\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/910\/revisions\/916"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/indadfo.com\/site\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=910"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/indadfo.com\/site\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=910"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/indadfo.com\/site\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=910"},{"taxonomy":"post_folder","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/indadfo.com\/site\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/post_folder?post=910"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
\nThe plea raised by the learned counsel for the petitioner is that similar matters are pending in Civil Appeal No. 6550\/2015 and other connected matters.
\nMerely because similar matters are pending is not a ground to grant leave and take the matter when the authorities have been negligent in filing the appeal. We have repeatedly emphasized that unless the case is brought within the parameters of Chief Post Master General & Ors. v. Living Media India Ltd. & Anr. \u2013 (2012) 3 SCC 563, we would not be inclined to condone the delay and have in fact dismissed the special leave petitions with cost categorizing them as \u201ccertificate cases\u201d only brought before the Court to complete a formality and save the skin of the officers concerned.
\nThe learned counsel for the petitioner submits that more than Rs. 5 Crores is at stake. If that be, the authorities should recover it from the officer concerned.
\nBefore we proceed with the application further, we would like to know the steps which have been taken by the appellant against the officers concerned!
\nIf it has not been done, then an inquiry must be held, responsibility fixed and the action taken against the officers be placed before us.<\/p>\n
\nThe learned Additional Solicitor General requests for three months\u2019 time to complete the process.
\nWe may only note that it has taken a year\u2019s delay apart from the 90 days period to file the special leave petition and now three months further are required to complete action against the officers concerned. So much for the anxiety about the revenue!<\/p>\n
\n(MANISH ISSRANI) (POONAM VAID) COURT MASTER(SH) COURT MASTER (NSH)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"